SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0269881107083842v1
0269881107083842v2
0269881107083842v3
0269881107083842v4
0269881107083842v5
0269881107083842v6
22/8/849    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassaday, H J
Right arrow Articles by Horsley, R.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cassaday, H J
Right arrow Articles by Horsley, R.R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DEXTROAMPHETAMINE
*DOPAMINE
*METHYLPHENIDATE
*NICOTINE
*NICOTINE TARTRATE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Methylphenidate and nicotine focus responding to an informative discrete CS over successive sessions of appetitive conditioning

H J Cassaday*, Beate C. Finger, and R.R. Horsley

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Methylphenidate (MP) and nicotine would be expected to improve associative learning, though previous evidence suggests that they should reduce the selectivity with which associations are formed. Here we tested their effects on learning the association between a conditioned stimulus(CS) and food (unconditioned stimulus, UCS) in male Wistar rats. The UCS was delivered immediately (0 s) following CS offset or after a 10 s trace. In addition to the measures of discrete CS conditioning, contextual and trace responding was measured in the inter–trial– and the inter–stimulus interval, respectively. In all cases, conditioning was measured as nosepoking for food. Both MP and nicotine improved the acquisition of discrete cue conditioning. Acquisition was accelerated (compared to saline) under 5 but not 1mg/kg MP and 0.6, but not 0.4mg/kg nicotine. In each case, this effect was observed in 0 s but not 10 s conditioned groups. For comparison, some earlier published data obtained following the same procedure with D–amphetamine were re–analysed in the same way. Amphetamine similarly improved conditioning in the 0 s group, in this case at 0.5, but not 1.5mg/kg. Thus three different dopamine agonists increased the ability to focus responding to CS presentations oversuccessive sessions of appetitive acquisition.

Key Words: methylphenidate, nicotine, trace interval, appetitive conditioning, rat

First published on January 21, 2008, doi:10.1177/0269881107083842

Journal of Psychopharmacology 2008;22:849.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
This version was published on May 27, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement