SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0269881106081528v1
22/3/290    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grimond–Billa, S K
Right arrow Articles by Cassaday, H J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grimond–Billa, S K
Right arrow Articles by Cassaday, H J
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Selectively increased trace conditioning under the neurotensin agonist PD 149163 in an aversive procedure in which SR 142948A was without intrinsic effect

S K Grimond–Billa, C Norman, G W Bennett, and H J Cassaday*

Institute of Neuroscience, Schools of Psychology and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that neurotensin (NT) may enhance cognitive function. The present study, therefore, examined the role of NT in associative learning between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (UCS). This was tested in a trace procedure using conditioned suppression of drinking with a noise CS and foot shock UCS. We compared the effects of an NT agonist (PD 149163, 0.25 and 1mg/kg) with those of an NT antagonist (SR 142948A, 0.01 and 0.1mg/kg). Conditioning after drug treatment was followed by drug–free tests of associative learning. At 0.25 but not 1mg/kg, PD 149163 selectively increased conditioning over the trace interval: there was no such increased conditioning in the 0 s group. This increased conditioning over the trace is an effect that is reliably produced by dopamine (DA) agonists in the same procedure. However, dissimilar to the effects of DA agonists, conditioning to box context, was reduced under PD 149163. Doses of SR 142948A, selected on the basis of their effects in similar aversively motivated tests of latent inhibition, were without intrinsic effect in the present procedure. The dose–related dissociation between trace and contextual conditioning effects under PD 149163 is considered as cognitive enhancement.

Key Words: aversive conditioning, trace conditioning, neurotensin, PD 149163, SR 1 42948A, rat

First published on February 28, 2008, doi:10.1177/0269881106081528

Journal of Psychopharmacology 2008;22:290.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement