SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0269881106062902v1
0269881106062902v2
20/6/834    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rostami-Hodjegan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rostami-Hodjegan, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

The impact of experimental design on assessing mechanism-based activation of CYP2D6 by MDMA (Ecstasy)

Linh M. Van1, Amir Heydari1, Jiansong Yang2, Judith Hargreaves3, Karen Rowland-Yeo2, Martin S. Lennard1, Geoffrey T. Tucker4, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan4*

1 Academic Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Sheffield, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenetics Group, Division of Clinical Sciences (South), Sheffield, UK.
2 Simcyp Ltd, Blades Enterprise Centre, Sheffield, UK.
3 AstraZeneca, DMPK, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK.
4 Academic Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Sheffield, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenetics Group, Division of Clinical Sciences (South), and Simcyp Ltd, Blades Enterprise Centre, Sheffield, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

MDMA (3-4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, commonly known as Ecstasy) is a potent mechanism-based inhibitor (MBI) of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), causing quasi-irreversible inhibition of the enzyme in vitro. An evaluation of the in vivo implications of this phenomenon depends on the accuracy of the estimates of the parameters that define the inhibition in vitro, namely kinact (the maximal inhibition rate) and KI (the inactivation constant). These values are determined in two steps, pre-incubation of the enzyme with the inhibitor (enzyme inactivation), followed by dilution and further incubation to measure residual enzyme activity with a probe substrate. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different dilutions and probe substrate concentrations on the estimates of kinact and KI using recombinantly expressed CYP2D6. Enzyme activity was measured by the conversion of dextromethorphan (DEX) to dextrorphan (DOR). Dilution factors of 1.25, 2, 5, 10, 25 and 50 (DEX at 30 µM) gave mean (µ SE) values of kinact (min-1) of 0.20 µ 0.06, 0.21 µ 0.05, 0.31 µ 0.06, 0.37 µ 0.11, 0.51 µ 0.10 and 0.58 µ 0.08, respectively, and KI (µM) values (after correction for non-specific microsomal binding) of 2.22 µ 1.90, 2.80 µ 1.34, 5.78 µ 2.07, 6.36 µ 2.93, 3.99 µ 1.57 and 4.86 µ 1.37, respectively. Accordingly, high (e.g. 50 fold) and low (e.g. 1.25 fold) dilutions were associated with statistically significant differences in kinetic values (p < 0.05). Varying DEX concentration (10-100 µM) was not associated with significant changes in kinact and KI values when a five-fold dilution was used (with the exception of a lower KI at 10 µM DEX). High dilution was also shown to reduce non-specific microsomal binding of MDMA. The changes in the two kinetic parameters were dependent on the experimental procedure and shown to be unlikely to have a material influence on the maximum inhibition of CYP2D6 expected in vivo after typical recreational doses of MDMA (50-100 mg), since the potency of inhibition was high. The different values of the kinetic parameters were predicted to have a marginal influence on the time for recovery of enzyme activity following re-synthesis of CYP2D6.

Key Words: MDMA, Ecstasy, mechanism-based enzyme inhibition, CYP2D6

First published on February 14, 2006, doi:10.1177/0269881106062902

Journal of Psychopharmacology 2006;20:834.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. W. Grimm, H. J. Einolf, S. D. Hall, K. He, H.-K. Lim, K.-H. J. Ling, C. Lu, A. A. Nomeir, E. Seibert, K. W. Skordos, et al.
The Conduct of in Vitro Studies to Address Time-Dependent Inhibition of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes: A Perspective of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2009; 37(7): 1355 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement