SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tripp, G.
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tripp, G.
Right arrow Articles by McNaughton, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Naloxone and chlordiazepoxide: effects on acquisition of DRL and signalled DRL

G. Tripp

Department of Psychology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

N. McNaughton

Department of Psychology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

The ability of the opiate antagonist, naloxone, to block the anti-conflict effects of the benzodiazepines suggests endogenous opioid involvement in the mechanism of action of these drugs. However naloxone's ability to attenuate the effects of the benzodiazepines in animal conflict paradigms appears to be schedule specific. It is effective in acquisition of a differential reinforcement of low rates of response (DRL) schedule but not in acquisition of a non-reward successive discrimination schedule. We tested the effects of naloxone and chlordiazepoxide on acquisition of DRL and on acquisition of a version of the same schedule (signalled DRL) which was like successive discrimination in having an explicit visual signal of non-reward. Chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg i.p.) impaired DRL responding by increasing burst responding and premature responding close to the criterion interval. Naloxone (3 mg/kg i.p.) alone decreased burst and premature responding, it also blocked the effects of chlordiazepoxide. The signalled DRL schedule produced essentially similar drug effects. Clearly the critical schedule parameter determining whether naloxone will attenuate the anxiolytic actions of the benzodiazepines is not the presence or absence of an explicit signal of conflict.

Key Words: naloxone • chlordiazepoxide • DRL • signalled DRL • non-reward

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 88-94 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/026988119200600116


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement