SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Swayze, I. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hinson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Swayze, I. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Place avoidance conditioning with D-amphetamine: the effect of screening and the use of preferred and non-preferred sides

Riley E. Hinson

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Anne-Marie Wall

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Ian G. Swayze

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

The effect of screening animals to identify unconditioned preferences for stimuli used in subsequent place conditioning, and the effect of pairing drug injections with originally most or least preferred stimuli were investigated in place conditioning with 0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg D-amphetamine. A choice test to identify conditioned approach and avoidance responses was given after every two end compartment drug trials until a total of 10 choice tests had been given. During drug trials, the drug was injected 15 min after the animal was placed in the end compartment and the animal remained in the end compartment for 30 min following drug injection. In confirmation of previous research from our laboratory, during choice tests, animals avoided the end compartment that had been paired with D-amphetamine and this avoidance occurred regardless of whether the animals had been initially screened or not, and regardless of whether the originally most or least preferred stimuli were used as the drug-associated end compartment.

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 207-214 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/026988119100500305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
R. E. Hinson, S. A. McKee, T. Lovenjak, and A.-M. Wall
The effect of the CS-UCS interval and extinction on place conditioning and analgesic tolerance with morphine
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1993; 7(2): 164 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement