SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leber, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leber, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

British Association for Psychopharmacology Max Hamilton Memorial Lecture Quantitative estimates of drug effects in psychopharmacology: what we measure and what we do not

Paul Leber

Potomac, MD 20854, USA

This paper is an edited version of the Max Hamilton Memorial Lecture that was delivered at the annual meeting of the British Association for Psychopharmacology in Cambridge in July 1989. In tribute to Professor Hamilton's pioneering efforts in the field, the lecture focuses on several aspects of the measurement process in psychopharmacology. The role of enumeration in the classification of psychopathology is reviewed and its importance illustrated with an example drawn from the literature. Attention is given to the fundamental link between agreements within the field about the nature and qualities of clinical phenomena and the field's ability to construct and use multi-item rating scales to measure meaningful changes in the intensity of psychopathology. The importance of global assessment as a validation procedure is emphasized and selected hazards to reliable inference are examined.

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 53-62 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/026988119000400202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement