This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Durcan, M. J. Articles by Morgan, P. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Durcan, M. J. Articles by Morgan, P. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Time-course of the hypomotility effects of the adenosine analogues, cyclohexyladenosine and N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine, in a holeboard test

Laboratory of Clinical Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, DICBR, Building 10, Room 3C 102, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA

Philip F. Morgan

Laboratory of Clinical Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, DICBR, Building 10, Room 3C 102, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA

The time-course of the hypomotility effects of the adenosine analogues 5'-N- ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) and N⁶-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) was investigated in a holeboard test. Behaviourally equipotent doses of both compounds given to independent groups of animals showed significant depression of both exploratory head-dipping and locomotor activity at the 9, 18 and 36 min time points after drug administration. No significant differences from control group values were detected at 72 or 144 min post-administration. Additionally, the effects of both analogues administered immediately before a holeboard test were examined by investigating four 2 min time bins over the 8 min test session. Significant drug x time bin interactions were detected: NECA and CHA both showed faster reductions in locomotor activity, and NECA more reduction in head-dipping, over the test as compared to control. However, no differences between NECA and CHA on test habituation were detected. The results of these experiments support the view that pharmacodynamic rather than phar macokinetic factors may be responsible for the different behavioural potencies of NECA and CHA.

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 175-179 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026988118900300308


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?