This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stolerman, I.P. Articles by Garcha, H.S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stolerman, I.P. Articles by Garcha, H.S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Temporal factors in drug discrimination: Experiments with nicotine

Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK

H.S. Garcha

Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK

The role of the presession interval (PI) in drug discrimination research has been studied in rats trained to discriminate nicotine from saline in a two-bar operant conditioning procedure. Different groups of rats were trained at different Pls, varying between 5 and 35 min, and tests were then carried out for qualitative and quantitative differences between the cues. There was complete generalization from nicotine cues trained at one time to tests carried out at other times. The sensitivity of the cues at different Pls to the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine was very similar. Generalization to amphetamine was nearly complete when the nicotine cue was established with PI of 20-35 min and only partial when the PI for the nicotine was 5 min. Thus, there was no clear evidence for any qualitative difference between nicotine cues established with different PIs. However, the PI influenced quantitative aspects of the nicotine cue in a marked and complex manner. Increasing the PI during training produced a two- to three-fold decrease in the ED₅₀, whereas increasing the PI during testing produced a two- to three-fold increase in the ED₅₀. This shows that the effects of changing the PIs during training and testing were similar in magnitude but opposite in direction. These changes in ED₅₀ values can be explained by pharmacokinetic considerations in conjunction with knowledge of the role of training dose in the discrimination of nicotine. The quantitative sensitivity of the drug discrimination procedure can be substantially influenced by the choice of temporal parameters used in training and testing.

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 88-97 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026988118900300207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.S. Garcha and I.P. Stolerman Discriminative stimulus effects of the nicotine antagonist mecamylamine in rats J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1993; 7(1_suppl): 43 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]