| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Review: Should ethanol be scheduled as a drug of high risk to public health?National Addiction Centre, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand, doug.sellman{at}otago.ac.nz
Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington Hospital, Wellington South, New Zealand
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
Six criteria described in the New Zealand Misuse of Drugs Act and used by the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs (EACD) for determining the risk of a drug to public health were examined in relation to ethanol, using
Key Words: alcohol classification drugs of abuse
This version was published on January
1, 2009 Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 23, No. 1,
94-100 (2009) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) as a comparator drug. GHB is an ideal candidate for use as a comparator because it is a sedative substance very similar to ethanol and has been previously investigated by the EACD using these six criteria. GHB was subsequently classified as a Class B1 drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act, that is, as a prohibited drug of high risk to public health. The dangerousness level of ethanol was found to be at least similar to that of GHB in this analysis. This highlights a major discrepancy in public policy.