SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0269881107083844v1
22/7/737    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mogg, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mogg, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do the affective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers?

BP Bradley

Centre for the Study of Emotion and Motivation, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK, bpb{at}soton.ac.uk

M. Field

Centre for the Study of Emotion and Motivation, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK, School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

H. Healy

Centre for the Study of Emotion and Motivation, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK

K. Mogg

Centre for the Study of Emotion and Motivation, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK

Research indicates that drug-related cues elicit attention and approach biases in drug users. However, attentional biases are not unique to addiction (e.g., they are also found for emotional information). This study examined whether attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers are mediated by the motivational salience of cues (relevance to drug-taking), rather than by their affective properties (subjective liking of the cues). Cues included pleasant and unpleasant smoking-related pictures. Attentional biases, approach tendencies and subjective evaluation of the cues were assessed on visual probe, stimulus—response compatibility and rating tasks, respectively. Compared with non-smokers, smokers showed a greater attentional bias for both pleasant and unpleasant smoking-related cues presented for 2000 ms, but not for 200 ms. Smokers showed a greater approach bias for unpleasant cues, although the groups did not differ significantly in approach bias for pleasant smoking-related cues. Smokers rated both pleasant and unpleasant smoking pictures more positively than did non-smokers. Results suggest that a bias to maintain attention on smoking-related cues in young adult smokers is primarily a function of drug-relevance, rather than affective properties, of the cues. In contrast, approach tendencies and pleasantness judgements were influenced by drug use, drug-relevance and the affective properties of the cues.

Key Words: drug dependence • cigarette smoker • attentional bias • approach bias • stimulus evaluation • affective properties • visual probe task • stimulus—response compatibility task

This version was published on September 1, 2008

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 22, No. 7, 737-745 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269881107083844


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
M. Field, T. Duka, E. Tyler, and T. Schoenmakers
Attentional bias modification in tobacco smokers
Nicotine Tob Res, July 1, 2009; 11(7): 812 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement