This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269881107079062v1 0269881107079062v2 22/2/172    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Horsley, R. Articles by Cassaday, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Horsley, R. Articles by Cassaday, H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB DEXTROAMPHETAMINE Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Appetitive overshadowing is disrupted by systemic amphetamine but not by electrolytic lesions to the nucleus accumbens shell

School of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, Psychology Division, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

PM Moran

School of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

HJ Cassaday

School of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, Helen.Cassaday{at}nottingham.ac.uk

There is evidence that the indirect dopamine (DA) agonist amphetamine (AMP) can disrupt selective learning in an aversive overshadowing task, consistent with a role for the DA system in this form of salience manipulation. In the following experiments we assessed in the male Wistar rat: (1) whether amphetamine disruption of overshadowing extends to an appetitively motivated overshadowing task; and (2) whether selective electrolytic lesions to the n.acc (shell versus core subfields) disrupt appetitively motivated overshadowing. The experiments used sucrose reward pellets as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS). In each case, a conditioned stimulus (CS, light) was either conditioned alone or in compound together with a more intense CS (noise or tone). The presence of overshadowing was demonstrated as reduced conditioning to the light when it had been previously conditioned in compound compared to when it had been conditioned alone.

It was predicted that AMP and lesions to the n.acc shell would disrupt overshadowing. AMP was found to abolish overshadowing at 0.5 mg/kg, but not at 1 mg/kg. Contrary to prediction, the shell lesioned animals did not differ from shams. The results of Experiment 1 add to the evidence that the DA system can moderate salience processing of weaker predictors, also in cases where CS salience is manipulated directly via the physical intensities of the stimuli, as here. However, in terms of the brain structures involved, Experiment 2 suggests that, overshadowing is moderated by projections of the DA system without n.acc.

Key Words: appetitive conditioning • overshadowing • amphetamine • nucleus accumbens • dopamine • rat

This version was published on March 1, 2008

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 172-181 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269881107079062


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?