| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Adequacy of continuation and maintenance treatments for major depression in JapanDepartment of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan, akifujita{at}hcc6.bai.ne.jp
Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
Department of Clinical Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan Guidelines for treating depression often recommend continuing antidepressants at least for 6 months after remission. Whether this recommendation is implemented in daily practices represents a serious concern. We aimed to examine adequacy of continuation and maintenance treatment in Japan. A naturalistic prospective follow-up study with mood disorders was undertaken in 23 psychiatric departments from all over Japan. A total of 95 patients diagnosed with major depression were followed up every month until treatment termination and every 6 months thereafter. In this study, the cohort received 45.1 (SD = 64.7) mg of imipramine or equivalent per day during continuation phase, and about 74% were prescribed inadequate doses, i.e. less than 75 mg/day. At maintenance phase immediately before relapse, average dosage was 42.0 (SD = 74.7) mg/day and 83% were prescribed inadequate doses. There is gross under-treatment of depression during continuation and maintenance phases in Japan.
Key Words: major depressive disorder continuation treatment maintenance treatment
This version was published on March
1, 2008 Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 22, No. 2,
153-156 (2008) |
|||