This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269881106060764v1 20/5/670    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sumnall, H. R. Articles by Jerome, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sumnall, H. R. Articles by Jerome, L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The varieties of ecstatic experience: an exploration of the subjective experiences of ecstasy

Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

Jon C. Cole

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Lisa Jerome

Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), Sarasota, FL, USA

Previous investigations of the subjective effects of MDMA (material sold as ecstasy) have conducted interviews and surveys of various groups of ecstasy users within particular sub-populations. This study examined subjective drug effects reported by different sub-populations of ecstasy users and explored whether the function or purpose served by using ecstasy influenced the nature of the drug experience. Drawing on previous measures of alterations in consciousness, psychedelic drugs and cannabis, and informal interviews with ecstasy users and MDMA researchers, a 130-item survey assessing subjective effects of ecstasy/MDMA was developed. Principal components analysis of responses of ecstasy users revealed six components; perceptual alterations, entactogenic effects, prosocial effects, aesthetic effects, negative effects and sexual effects. The derived scale was used to predict ecstasy use behaviours, and functions and experiences of use. A variety of component scores were related to ecstasy use parameters; in particular, heavier users expected fewer negative, perceptual and aesthetic effects from taking the drug. The reasons given for using ecstasy (use function) also influenced reported drug effects. Abstainers expected greater negative, perceptual, aesthetic and sexual effects than users. These data indicate that the subjective ecstasy experience is influenced by a variety of extra-psychopharmacological factors. Drug intervention strategies may be made more effective by targeting particular user groups defined by reasons given for substance use, as it is likely that their experiences of ecstasy effects will differ. Future research into ecstasy may be improved by recognizing user diversity.

Key Words: ecstasy • MDMA • entactogens • drug effect expectancies • inventory

This version was published on September 1, 2006

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 20, No. 5, 670-682 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0269881106060764


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Dumont, C. Kramers, F. Sweep, J. Willemsen, D. Touw, R. Schoemaker, J. van Gerven, J. Buitelaar, and R. Verkes Ethanol co-administration moderates 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine effects on human physiology J Psychopharmacol, February 1, 2010; 24(2): 165 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pirona and M. Morgan An investigation of the subacute effects of ecstasy on neuropsychological performance, sleep and mood in regular ecstasy users J Psychopharmacol, February 1, 2010; 24(2): 175 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Sessa Is there a case for MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in the UK? J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 220 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]