SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Redman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bedi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Redman, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Self-reported ecstasy use: the impact of assessment method on dosage estimates in recreational users

Gillinder Bedi

Jennifer Redman

Department of Psychology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

While research has associated recreational ecstasy use with negative outcomes, there remain a number of methodological limitations of human studies. The present study examined the impact of self-report methodology on lifetime ecstasy dosage figures using three estimation methods: a single question estimation, a context-based timeline method and a quantity–frequency method. We used a repeated measures design, testing 38 participants aged over 18 years who reported using ecstasy on ten or more occasions. Methodology was found to impact on estimations made, with the timeline method producing higher figures than the single question. While single question and timeline estimations were positively correlated, there was no relationship between either of these methods and the quantity–frequency method. The present findings are in keeping with indications in the alcohol and other drug literature that the use of contextual memory cues increases accuracy of recall as indicated by higher estimations, and that quantity–frequency methods may not adequately assess variability in lifetime drug-use patterns.

Key Words: ecstasy • MDMA • self-report • retrospective data • methodology

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 432-436 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0269881106063272


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
K Allott, B. Canny, J. Broadbear, N. Stepto, B Murphy, and J Redman
Neuroendocrine and subjective responses to pharmacological challenge with citalopram: a controlled study in male and female ecstasy/MDMA users
J Psychopharmacol, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 759 - 774.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
G. Bedi and J. Redman
Metamemory in recreational ecstasy polydrug users: what do self-reports of memory failures mean?
J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2008; 22(8): 872 - 881.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement