SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Parrott, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Parrott, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Problematic versus non-problematic ecstasy/MDMA use: the influence of drug usage patterns and pre-existing psychiatric factors

K. Soar

J. J. D. Turner

School of Psychology, University of East London, London, UK.

A. C. Parrott

Department of Psychology, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK.

Recreational ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine; MDMA) use has been increasingly associated with a number of psychiatric symptoms and psychological problems. However, previous studies assessing possible psychopathological effects have not identified whether users consider their ecstasy use ‘problematic’ or not. In addition, research has generally failed to address the potential role of premorbid psychiatric status. This study aimed to assess whether premorbid psychiatric history and/or patterns of ecstasy use would be associated with the degree of selfreported problems attributable to ecstasy. Problematic ecstasy users (n 53) who had reported problems attributable to their ecstasy use were compared with non-problematic ecstasy users (n 62), polydrug controls (n 62) and illegal drug-naive controls (n 111) on a recreational drug use questionnaire; a questionnaire, which ascertained personal and family psychiatric histories, and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Problematic ecstasy users exhibited significantly higher scores on a number of dimensions of the BSI compared to illegal drugnaive and/or polydrug controls. Problematic ecstasy users also exhibited significantly elevated scores on somatization, depression, anxiety and negative psychobiology compared to non-problematic ecstasy users. BSI scores for the non-problematic ecstasy users did not differ from polydrug or illegal drug-naive controls. Problematic ecstasy users reported significantly higher levels of ecstasy use, including lifetime consumption, average dosage and binge consumption compared to non-problematic ecstasy users. Additionally, a greater number of problematic ecstasy users reported personal and family psychiatric histories compared to controls and non-problematic ecstasy users. This study demonstrates two distinct ecstasy using groups: non-problematic ecstasy users who are not showing signs of psychopathology and problematic ecstasy users who are showing evidence of a range of symptoms. This data therefore partially supports the link between ecstasy dosage and negative psychological sequalae, but highlights the importance of the need to consider ecstasy-related attributions, pre-existing mental health status and vulnerability.

Key Words: problematic ecstasy use • psychopathology • MDMA • premorbid psychiatric history

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 417-424 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0269881106063274


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Atten DisordHome page
L. L. Weyandt, G. Janusis, K. G. Wilson, G. Verdi, G. Paquin, J. Lopes, M. Varejao, and C. Dussault
Nonmedical Prescription Stimulant Use Among a Sample of College Students: Relationship With Psychological Variables
J Atten Disord, November 1, 2009; 13(3): 284 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
K Soar, A Parrott, and J Turner
Attributions for psychobiological changes in ecstasy/MDMA and other polydrug users
J Psychopharmacol, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 745 - 758.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
M. G. Vaughn, J. M. Wallace Jr., L. E. Davis, G. T. Fernandes, and M. O. Howard
Variations in Mental Health Problems, Substance Use, and Delinquency Between African American and Caucasian Juvenile Offenders: Implications for Reentry Services
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 2008; 52(3): 311 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
D. Hasin and H. Katz
Somatoform and Substance Use Disorders
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2007; 69(9): 870 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
B. Sessa
Is there a case for MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in the UK?
J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement