| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Evidence that background GABAergic tone and possible ligand release may alter the action of the 'neutral' benzodiazepine-receptor antagonist, Ro 15-1788, in hypothalamic self-stimulationExperimental Psychology Laboratory, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
Department of Psychology, City of London Polytechnic, London, UK
Experimental Psychology Laboratory, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK Upward or downward shifts in the level of brain GABAergictransmission have been held to be necessary and sufficient to promote release of endogenous ligands ('endocoids') for the benzodiazepine (BZD) recognition site. To investigate this possibility, variable-interval self-stimulation performance was used to monitor 'intrinsic' benzodiazepine-like and anti- benzodiazepine activity by the 'neutral' benzodiazepine-receptor antagonist, Ro 15-1788 (flumazenil) (10 or 30 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Rats were pretreated with either a GABA synthesis blocking agent (isoniazid, 130 mg/kg subcutaneously), or with a GABA agonist (progabide, 30 or 100 mg/kg intraperitoneally). The lower dose of Ro 15-1788 (10 mg/kg), without pretreatment, did not affect self-stimulation; higher doses (30 mg/kg) caused a brief (<20 min) depression. Isoniazid (130 mg/kg) depressed self-stimulation, but did not modify the activity of Ro 15-1788. In rats pretreated with progabide (100 mg/kg), low doses of Ro 15- 1788 (10 mg/kg) that were previously without effect now caused a sharp fall in responding. These findings can be interpreted as showing that even low doses of Ro 15-1788 may affect self-stimulation under certain conditions, and that they do so by competing with an endogenous ligand for the benzodiazepine site, released by upward shifts in GABAergic activity. Alternative explanations in terms of altered receptor function seem less feasible. The results imply that the action of the endogenous ligand would not resemble that of a typical benzodiazepine, but that of an inverse agonist (that is, proconflict and proconvulsant); this conclusion agrees with recent biochemical evidence.
Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 2, No. 1,
5-12 (1988) |
|||