This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mohr, C. Articles by Brugger, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mohr, C. Articles by Brugger, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Blinking and schizotypal thinking

Neurology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland and Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, christine.mohr{at}bristol.ac.uk

P. S. Sándor

Neurology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland and Department of Headache, Institute of Neurology, London, UK

T. Landis

Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

M. Fathi

Clinical Chemistry Central Laboratory, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

P. Brugger

Neurology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Spontaneous eye blink rate (SBR) is thought to be a biological marker for cerebral dopamine (DA) activity. Accordingly, positive psychotic symptoms have been found to be associated with an increased SBR and negative psychotic symptoms with a decreased SBR. However, modulations of the DA system in patient populations also result from prior neuroleptic treatment. Here, we tested the possible relationship between SBR and positive and negative schizotypal thought. To test the direct influence of DA on SBR in general and as a function of schizotypy, half of a sample of 40 healthy men received levodopa and the other half placebo in a double-blind procedure. SBR did not differ between substance groups suggesting that a pharmacologically induced DA increase in healthy individuals does not generally increase SBR. However, in the levodopa group, increasing SBR correlated with increasing negative schizotypy scores, while no relationship was found between SBR and (1) negative schizotypy in the placebo group, or (2) positive schizotypy in either substance group. We conjecture that a pre-existing hypodopaminergic state in high negative schizotypy scorers, made these individuals susceptible to an increased DA concentration, as it has been observed in Parkinson’s disease. Furthermore, the absence of any relationship in the placebo group might suggest that variations in DA concentration as a function of schizotypy are too subtle to influence SBR. Finally, the lack of any association of SBR with positive schizotypy might indicate that SBR and positive schizotypy are mediated by functionally distinct neural circuits

Key Words: Magical Ideation • Physical Anhedonia • spontaneous eye blink rate • dopamine • symptoms • high-risk

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?