This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kantini, E. Articles by Cassaday, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kantini, E. Articles by Cassaday, H. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Amphetamine decreases the expression and acquisition of appetitive conditioning but increases the acquisition of anticipatory responding over a trace interval

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK

C. Norman

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK

H. J. Cassaday

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK, helen.cassaday{at}nottingham.ac.uk

The effects of amphetamine on selective learning were tested in a trace conditioning procedure, in which the informativeness of the conditioned stimulus (CS) (noise) was manipulated through the introduction of a time interval before the delivery of the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) (food). The results showed that d-amphetamine (0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg) impaired both the expression (Experiment 1b) and acquisition (Experiment 2) of appetitive conditioning. This was true for both trace and contiguously conditioned groups. The effects of the 0.5 mg/kg dose of d-amphetamine were not attributable to general motor (measured pre-CS) or motivational (measured post-UCS) effects of the drug. Moreover, the same pattern of effects (impaired appetitive conditioning, irrespective of the trace interval between CS and UCS) was confirmed in drug-free extinction tests. By contrast to the general depression in the acquisition and expression of associative learning observed under amphetamine, the 0.5 mg/kg dose promoted the acquisition of anticipatory responses made later in the trace interval (in Experiment 2 but, again, not the expression of previous conditioning in Experiment 1b). This suggests a dissociable effect of low-dose d-amphetamine on learning about the temporal relationship between CS and UCS.

Key Words: amphetamine • appetitive conditioning • dopamine • trace conditioning

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 516-526 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0269881104047279


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Cassaday, B. Finger, and R. Horsley Methylphenidate and nicotine focus responding to an informative discrete CS over successive sessions of appetitive conditioning J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2008; 22(8): 849 - 859. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Grimond-Billa, C Norman, G. Bennett, and H. Cassaday Selectively increased trace conditioning under the neurotensin agonist PD 149163 in an aversive procedure in which SR 142948A was without intrinsic effect J Psychopharmacol, May 1, 2008; 22(3): 290 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Horsley, P. Moran, and H. Cassaday Appetitive overshadowing is disrupted by systemic amphetamine but not by electrolytic lesions to the nucleus accumbens shell J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2008; 22(2): 172 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R.R. Horsley and H. J. Cassaday Methylphenidate can reduce selectivity in associative learning in an aversive trace conditioning task J Psychopharmacol, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 492 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF]