This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tiplady, B. Articles by Drummond, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tiplady, B. Articles by Drummond, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Errors in performance testing: a comparison of ethanol and temazepam

Department of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh; AstraZeneca UK Clinical Research Group, 10 Logie Mill, Logie Green Road, Edinburgh EH7 4HG, UK brian.tiplady{at}astrazeneca.com

J. Hiroz

L. Holmes

Department of Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

G. Drummond

Department of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Both ethanol and benzodiazepines impair psychomotor function. Previous work has suggested that ethanol may have a greater effect on errors while benzodiazepines may cause greater slowing, but this has not been tested in a direct comparison. We assessed the effects of ethanol, at blood concentrations of approximately 80–100 mg/100 ml, compared to two doses of temazepam (20 mg and 30 mg) on psychomotor speed and accuracy and on long-term memory. Sixteen healthy volunteers (eight male, aged 20–25 years) took part in a four-period, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Performance was evaluated using analysis of covariance (critical significance level, p= 0.05) comparing the areas under the response-time curves. Performance on a psychomotor maze showed an almost complete dissociation, with ethanol leading to a substantial and significant increase in errors with little effect on speed, while temazepam slowed performance with no significant change in accuracy. Other tasks showed a similar pattern, but the dissociation was less complete. Handwriting size was substantially increased by ethanol, but not by temazepam. Information processing capacity and long-term memory formation were reduced by a similar amount both for ethanol and 30 mg temazepam. The faster, more error-prone, behaviour on ethanol than with a similarly impairing dose of temazepam has clear implications for the relative potential of the two drugs to contribute to accidents. The results are also important in understanding the differential effects of drugs with different mechanisms of action on human performance.

Key Words: ethanol • handwriting • memory • psychomotor errors • psychomotor speed • speed accuracy trade-off • temazepam

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 41-49 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0269881103017001691


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Duarte, A. McNeill, G. Drummond, and B. Tiplady Comparison of the sedative, cognitive, and analgesic effects of nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, and ethanol Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 203 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Acons, L.-s. Chan, G. Drummond, and B. Tiplady Effects of ethanol and promethazine on awareness of errors and judgements of performance J Psychopharmacol, September 1, 2006; 20(5): 661 - 669. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Tiplady, R. Baird, H. Lutcke, G. Drummond, and P. Wright Effects of ethanol on kinaesthetic perception J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2005; 19(6): 627 - 632. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Tiplady, E. Bowness, L. Stien, and G. Drummond Selective effects of clonidine and temazepam on attention and memory J Psychopharmacol, May 1, 2005; 19(3): 259 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]