SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franken, I. H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franken, I. H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Selective cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence

Ingmar H. A. Franken

Parnassia Addiction Research Centre PO Box 53002, 2505 AA The Hague, The Netherlands; i.franken{at}parnassia.nl

Linda Y. Kroon

Parnassia Addiction Research Centre (PARC) University of Maastricht, The Netherlands

Reinout W. Wiers

Anita Jansen

Department of Psychology, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands

Previous studies provide evidence for the selective processing of disorder related stimuli on anxiety, depression, and eating disorders. There exist some preliminary indications that selective processing of drug cues may be involved in drug craving and relapse that deserve further investigation. In order to investigate the role of processing bias in an abnormal motivational system, the attentional bias for drug related stimuli was studied in a heroin dependent population. Heroin dependent participants (n = 21) and control participants (n= 30) performed a supra- and subliminal heroin Stroop task and heroin craving was assessed. Heroin dependent participants showed a considerable attentional bias for supraliminally presented heroin cues. However, there was no evidence for a preattentive bias on the subliminal presented cues. Reaction time on heroin cues was significantly predicted by heroin craving-levels. Results indicate that selective processing may be related to motivational induced states in general. The finding are discussed in the context of selective information processing in general psychopathology and in motivational processes as addiction specifically.

Key Words: addiction • attentional bias • cognitive processing • craving • motivational processes

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 395-400 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026988110001400408


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
D. I. Lubman, M. Yucel, J. W. L. Kettle, A. Scaffidi, T. MacKenzie, J. G. Simmons, and N. B. Allen
Responsiveness to Drug Cues and Natural Rewards in Opiate Addiction: Associations With Later Heroin Use
Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 2009; 66(2): 205 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
D. Lubman, N. Allen, L. Peters, and J. Deakin
Electrophysiological evidence that drug cues have greater salience than other affective stimuli in opiate addiction
J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2008; 22(8): 836 - 842.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
A. Fingelkurts, S. Kahkonen, A. Fingelkurts, R. Kivisaari, S. Borisov, V. Puuskari, O. Jokela, and T. Autti
Reorganization of the composition of brain oscillations and their temporal characteristics during opioid withdrawal
J Psychopharmacol, May 1, 2008; 22(3): 270 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
Ning Liu, Bo Li, N. Sun, and Yuanye Ma
Effects of addiction-associated and affective stimuli on the attentional blink in a sample of abstinent opiate dependent patients
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 64 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. J. Freed and J. J. Mann
Sadness and Loss: Toward a Neurobiopsychosocial Model
Am J Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 164(1): 28 - 34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
A. Weinstein and W. M. Cox
Cognitive processing of drug-related stimuli: the role of memory and attention
J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2006; 20(6): 850 - 859.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
J. I. ZETTELER, B. T. STOLLERY, A. M. WEINSTEIN, and A. R. LINGFORD-HUGHES
ATTENTIONAL BIAS FOR ALCOHOL-RELATED INFORMATION IN ADOLESCENTS WITH ALCOHOL-DEPENDENT PARENTS
Alcohol Alcohol., July 1, 2006; 41(4): 426 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
I. H.A. Franken, K. P. Hulstijn, C. J. Stam, V. M. Hendriks, and W. van den Brink
Two new neurophysiological indices of cocaine craving: evoked brain potentials and cue modulated startle reflex
J Psychopharmacol, December 1, 2004; 18(4): 544 - 552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
M. Munafo, K. Mogg, S. Roberts, B. P. Bradley, and M. Murphy
Selective Processing of Smoking-Related Cues in Current Smokers, Ex-Smokers and Never-Smokers on the Modified Stroop Task
J Psychopharmacol, September 1, 2003; 17(3): 310 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
K. Mogg and B. P. Bradley
Selective processing of smoking-related cues in smokers: manipulation of deprivation level and comparison of three measures of processing bias
J Psychopharmacol, July 1, 2002; 16(4): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement