This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tavernor, S. J. Articles by Szabadi, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tavernor, S. J. Articles by Szabadi, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of pentagastrin and the cold pressor test on the acoustic startle response and pupillary function in man

K. A. J. Abduljawad

R. W. Langley

Psychopharmacology Section, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK

C. M. Bradshaw

Psychopharmacology Section, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Room B109, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK; c.m.bradshaw{at}nottingham.ac.uk

E. Szabadi

Psychopharmacology Section, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK

Pentagastrin, a cholecystokinin2 (CCK2) receptor agonist, evokes autonomic and subjective features of anxiety in healthy volunteers. The present experiments examined the effects of pentagastrin on two responses with known sensitivity to another anxiogenic procedure (threat of electric shock): the acoustic startle response and the pupillary light reflex. The effects of pentagastrin were compared with those of the cold pressor test, a procedure known to elicit sympathetic activation. Twelve healthy males (18–35 years) participated in two experiments each consisting of two sessions in which they received (1) pentagastrin (0.3 µg/kg, i.v.) and a control infusion (saline), and (2) cold pressor test (90 s hand immersion at 4 °C) and a control immersion (37 °C), using a balanced single-blind protocol. Electromyographic responses of the orbicularis oculi to 40 ms, 1 kHz, 115 dB tones (‘startle responses’) [Experiment 1], and miotic responses to 200 ms, 0.43 mW/cm² light pulses [Experiment 2] were recorded before, during and after the infusions and hand immersions. Heart rate, blood pressure and subjective feelings were also recorded. The amplitude of the startle response was not significantly affected by pentagastrin, but was reduced during the cold pressor test. Resting pupil diameter increased during both pentagastrin infusion and the cold pressor test, but neither procedure altered the amplitude of the light reflex. Tachycardia, increased blood pressure and subjective anxiety were induced by both pentagastrin and the cold pressor test. The cardiovascular and mydriatic effects of pentagastrin and the cold pressor test are consistent with the known ability of these treatments to induce sympathetic activation. The anxiety induced by these treatments, unlike anxiety induced by threat of electric shock, was not accompanied by potentiation of the startle response or reduction of the miotic response. The results indicate that different anxiogenic procedures do not have equivalent effects on these reflexes.

Key Words: anxiety • cold pressor test • panic • pentagastrin • pupil • startle reflex

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 387-394 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026988110001400407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?