|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
An evaluation of the abuse potential of modafinil using methylphenidate as a reference
Donald R. Jasinski
Clinical Pharmacology/Chemical Dependence/Comprehensive Care Practice, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
Modafinil is a unique wake-promoting agent. Preclinical studies indicate a mechanism of action which is distinct from that of amphetamine or methylphenidate. To compare the pharmacodynamic profiles of modafinil, methylphenidate, and placebo in humans, a double-blind Latin square crossover study was conducted in 24 male volunteers with a history of polysubstance abuse that included the stimulant cocaine. Each subject was given single oral doses of methylphenidate (45 mg or 90 mg), modafinil (200 mg, 400 mg or 800 mg) and placebo. Measures of subjective, behavioural, and physiological responses were evaluated at fixed intervals during 72 h after each dosing occasion. Subjects discriminated both modafinil and methylphenidate from placebo. Subjects liked the effects of both drugs. However, modafinil differed from methylphenidate in its lack of a significant response on the Amphetamine Scale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. The profile of physiological effects for modafinil differed from methylphenidate in that it showed greater inhibition of observed and reported sleep, less facilitation of orthostatic tachycardia and less reduction of caloric intake. These findings are consistent with preclinical pharmacological data suggesting that modafinil is not an amphetamine-like agent.
Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 14, No. 1,
53-60 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026988110001400107

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Zack and C. Poulos
Effects of the atypical stimulant modafinil on a brief gambling episode in pathological gamblers with high vs. low impulsivity
J Psychopharmacol,
August 1, 2009;
23(6):
660 - 671.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ng and A. O'Brien
Beyond ADHD and narcolepsy: psychostimulants in general psychiatry
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.,
July 1, 2009;
15(4):
297 - 305.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Mann and P Bitsios
Modafinil treatment of amphetamine abuse in adult ADHD
J Psychopharmacol,
June 1, 2009;
23(4):
468 - 471.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Jasinski and S Krishnan
Human pharmacology of intravenous lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: abuse liability in adult stimulant abusers
J Psychopharmacol,
June 1, 2009;
23(4):
410 - 418.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Spathis, R Dhillan, D Booden, K Forbes, K Vrotsou, and K Fife
Modafinil for the treatment of fatigue in lung cancer: a pilot study
Palliative Medicine,
June 1, 2009;
23(4):
325 - 331.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Jasinski and S Krishnan
Abuse liability and safety of oral lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in individuals with a history of stimulant abuse
J Psychopharmacol,
June 1, 2009;
23(4):
419 - 427.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-M. Qu, Z.-L. Huang, X.-H. Xu, N. Matsumoto, and Y. Urade
Dopaminergic D1 and D2 Receptors Are Essential for the Arousal Effect of Modafinil
J. Neurosci.,
August 20, 2008;
28(34):
8462 - 8469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Parasrampuria, K. A. Schoedel, R. Schuller, J. Gu, P. Ciccone, S. A. Silber, and E. M. Sellers
Assessment of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Effects Related to Abuse Potential of a Unique Oral Osmotic-Controlled Extended-Release Methylphenidate Formulation in Humans
J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
December 1, 2007;
47(12):
1476 - 1488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Morein-Zamir, D. C. Turner, and B. J. Sahakian
A Review of the Effects of Modafinil on Cognition in Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull,
November 1, 2007;
33(6):
1298 - 1306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. O'BRIEN, C. A. DACKIS, and K. KAMPMAN
Does Modafinil Produce Euphoria?
Am J Psychiatry,
June 1, 2006;
163(6):
1109 - 1109.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Spencer, J. Biederman, P. E. Ciccone, B. K. Madras, D. D. Dougherty, A. A. Bonab, E. Livni, D. A. Parasrampuria, and A. J. Fischman
PET Study Examining Pharmacokinetics, Detection and Likeability, and Dopamine Transporter Receptor Occupancy of Short- and Long-Acting Oral Methylphenidate
Am J Psychiatry,
March 1, 2006;
163(3):
387 - 395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. J. Vocci, J. Acri, and A. Elkashef
Medication Development for Addictive Disorders: The State of the Science
Am J Psychiatry,
August 1, 2005;
162(8):
1432 - 1440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K R Kaufman and R Gerner
Modafinil in sports: ethical considerations
Br. J. Sports Med.,
April 1, 2005;
39(4):
241 - 244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Taneja, A. Diedrich, B. K. Black, D. W. Byrne, S. Y. Paranjape, and D. Robertson
Modafinil Elicits Sympathomedullary Activation
Hypertension,
April 1, 2005;
45(4):
612 - 618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Sugden and J. A. Bourgeois
Modafinil Monotherapy in Poststroke Depression
Psychosomatics,
February 1, 2004;
45(1):
80 - 81.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. I. Pack
Should a Pharmaceutical Be Approved for the Broad Indication of Excessive Sleepiness?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
January 15, 2003;
167(2):
109 - 111.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|