This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Martin-Iverson, M. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martin-Iverson, M. T. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB APOMORPHINE Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Does sensitization occur to prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex effects of repeated apomorphine treatments in rats?

Department of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Behavioural Science, Department of Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia; mmartini{at}psy.uwa.edu.au

There are conflicting reports as to whether or not the effects of dopamine agonist effects at reducing prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex develop sensitization with repeated treatments. In this experiment, rats (12 per each dose group) were treated for 10 days prior to startle-testing on each day with 0 (vehicle), 50, 200 or 800 mg/kg of apomorphine. Startle testing was conducted with each rat receiving no stimulus trials (null trials), startle pulse only trials (40 ms 105 dB white noise), prepulse only trials (20 ms 72 dB 5 kHz tone) and prepulse+pulse trials with a 100 ms stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA, i.e. the lead time from onset of prepulse to onset of pulse).The rats were then challenged after 57 days of withdrawal from the treatment regimen with a vehicle and apomorphine (200 mg/kg) injection with the order of injection counterbalanced. A range of SOAs and two different prepulse intensities (68 and 70 dB) were presented to every rat on the challenge tests. Sensitization developed during treatment to the increase in motor activity produced by the two higher doses, and to the increase in an orienting response produced by the prepulse stimulus in the highest dose group, but not to the prepulse inhibition effect of the drugs.The 50 mg/kg inhibitory autoreceptor selective dose decreased responses on the first of three blocks of both null trials and prepulse only trials. The two higher doses dose-dependently increased startle reflex amplitudes on the prepulse+pulse trials (reduced prepulse inhibition), but this effect did not exhibit sensitization during treatment.The lowest dose significantly increased prepulse inhibition relative to the vehicle-treated group on the first block of trials over days. After apomorphine challenge, sensitization to the effects of apomorphine on reducing prepulse inhibition was apparent for some dose groups at some SOAs. Sensitization to the effects of apomorphine on prepulse inhibition can be demonstrated upon a subsequent drug challenge if pretreatments are associated exclusively with the startle testing environment.

Key Words: apomorphine • dopamine • prepulse inhibition • rats • sensitization • startle reflex

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 261-273 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026988119901300320


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. E. Culm and R. P. Hammer Jr. Recovery of Sensorimotor Gating without G Protein Adaptation after Repeated D2-Like Dopamine Receptor Agonist Treatment in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2004; 308(2): 487 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]