SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Carroll, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ebmeier, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Carroll, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ebmeier, K. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Memory for emotional material: a comparison of central versus peripheral beta blockade

R. E. O'Carroll

Department of Psychology University of Stirling Stirling FK9 4LA UK reo1{at}stir.ac.uk

E. Drysdale

Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK

L. Cahill

Center for the Neurobiology of Learning, and Memory and Department of Psychobiology, University of California at Irvine, California, CA 92697–3800, USA

P. Shajahan

K. P. Ebmeier

MRC Brain Metabolism Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Park, Edinburgh, EH10 5HF, UK

The connection between affect and memory is poorly understood. A possible psychopharmacological linking mechanism is the sympathetic arousal that occurs in response to threatening or emotive material. Cahill et al. (1994) reported that a single administration of 40 mg propranolol hydrochloride, a non-selective b-adrenergic blocker, to healthy young adults significantly reduced delayed recall of emotive material, with recall of matched neutral material unaffected. This study differed importantly from the original Cahill et al. (1994) procedure in that only the emotionally arousing narrative was employed. Using the same slide presentation as Cahill et al. (1994), an experiment was carried out in order to determine whether b-adrenergic blockade significantly reduces recall of emotive material via a central or peripheral mode of action. Thirty-six healthy young adults were recruited as subjects. Subjects were randomly allocated to three groups: (a) placebo (b) 40 mg propranolol hydrochloride (a beta blocker which readily crosses the blood–brain barrier) and (c) 40 mg nadolol (a beta blocker which does not cross the blood–brain barrier). The three groups were matched for age, sex, intelligence, personality factors, and general memory functioning. Subjects viewed a series of 11 slides accompanied by a narrative, divisible into three phases. The emotionally arousing component of the narrative was introduced during phase II. Both central and peripheral beta blockade produced the expected effects on the sympathetic nervous system, as demonstrated by reliable reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In a surprise memory test 1week later, subjects were asked to recall as much as possible of the story and slides, and also completed a forced choice recognition memory test. All three groups showed heightened recall and recognition for the central (emotive) section of the story. There was no differential effect of beta blockade (either central or peripheral) relative to placebo. Beta blockade markedly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but resulted in no significant effect on memory for both emotional and neutral material.

Key Words: arousal • emotion • human • sympathetic

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 32-39 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026988119901300104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
J. N. Gelinas, G. Tenorio, N. Lemon, T. Abel, and P. V. Nguyen
{beta}-Adrenergic receptor activation during distinct patterns of stimulation critically modulates the PKA-dependence of LTP in the mouse hippocampus
Learn. Mem., April 25, 2008; 15(5): 281 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Hurlemann, B. Hawellek, A. Matusch, H. Kolsch, H. Wollersen, B. Madea, K. Vogeley, W. Maier, and R. J. Dolan
Noradrenergic Modulation of Emotion-Induced Forgetting and Remembering
J. Neurosci., July 6, 2005; 25(27): 6343 - 6349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
U. Muller, E. Mottweiler, and P. Bublak
Noradrenergic blockade and numeric working memory in humans
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 21 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
M. A. Mehta, E. C. Hinton, A. J. Montgomery, R. A. Bantick, and P. M. Grasby
Sulpiride and mnemonic function: effects of a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist on working memory, emotional memory and long-term memory in healthy volunteers
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement