This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bitsios, P. Articles by Bradshaw, C.M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bitsios, P. Articles by Bradshaw, C.M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The inhibition of the pupillary light reflex by the threat of an electric shock: a potential laboratory model of human anxiety

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG72UH, UK

E. Szabadi

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG72UH, UK

C.M. Bradshaw

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG72UH, UK

It has been shown that the eye-blink response evoked by an abrupt loud white noise ('acoustic startle') is potentiated when the subjects anticipate an aversive stimulus, e.g. an electric shock ('fear-potentiated startle'). It has been proposed that this paradigm may be a useful laboratory model of human anxiety. We examined whether the threat of an electric shock, as used in the fear-potentiated startle paradigm, would affect the pupillary light reflex, in 12 healthy volunteers. Light stimuli (0.32 mW/cm², 200 msec) were generated by a light-emitting diode, and pupil diameter was monitored by computerized binocular infrared television pupillometry in the dark. The light reflex was recorded during either the anticipation of a shock ('threat' blocks) or periods in which no shocks were anticipated ('safe' blocks). The shock consisted of a single square wave current pulse (1.5 mA, 50 msec) applied to the median nerve. At the end of each 'threat' or 'safe' block, subjects rated their anxiety using visual analogue scales. Two-factor analysis of variance (condition x block) showed that in the 'threat' condition there was a consistent increase in initial pupil diameter, a decrease in light reflex amplitude and an increase in alertness and anxiety ratings. These effects were observable before the subjects received any shock (a single stimulation of the median nerve). These results show that the anticipation of an electric shock can modify not only the startle reflex response but also the pupillary light reflex, suggesting that the inhibition of the light reflex by threat may be another suitable laboratory model of human anxiety.

Key Words: pupil • light reflex • startle reflex • fear • anxiety • humans

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 279-287 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026988119601000404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Graham, J. C. Scaife, R. W. Langley, C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, L. Xi, T. Crumley, N. Calder, K. Gottesdiener, and J. A. Wagner Effects of lorazepam on fear-potentiated startle responses in man J Psychopharmacol, May 1, 2005; 19(3): 249 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. G. Giakoumaki, E. Hourdaki, V. Grinakis, K. Theou, and P. Bitsios Effects of peripheral sympathetic blockade with dapiprazole on the fear-inhibited light reflex J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2005; 19(2): 139 - 148. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Tavernor, K. A. J. Abduljawad, R. W. Langley, C. M. Bradshaw, and E. Szabadi Effects of pentagastrin and the cold pressor test on the acoustic startle response and pupillary function in man J Psychopharmacol, July 1, 2000; 14(4): 387 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Bitsios, A. Philpott, R. W. Langley, C. M. Bradshaw, and E. Szabadi Comparison of the effects of diazepam on the fear-potentiated startle reflex and the fear-inhibited light reflex in man J Psychopharmacol, May 1, 1999; 13(3): 226 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]