SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychopharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, B.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, B.E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of chronic desipramine on waiting behaviour for a food reward in olfactory bulbectomized rats

J.P. Kelly

Department of Pharmacology, University College, Galway, Ireland

B.E. Leonard

Department of Pharmacology, University College, Galway, Ireland

The effects of olfactory bulbectomy (OB) on the 'waiting behaviour' of rats for a food reward in a T-maze, as well as the effect of chronic treatment with desipramine (7.5 mg/kg, i.p. x 14 days) prior to and throughout testing was assessed. In the T-maze, the time spent in locating a reward was longer in OB rats during the first phase of the food reward test. However, all groups chose the larger reward in at least 80% of trials by day 5 of test. Upon imposition of a delay in acquisition of the larger reward (phase 2), sham-operated rats chose the larger reward in correspondingly fewer trials until, by day 5, only 13% (control sham group) and 29% (desipramine-treated sham group) of trials were for the larger but delayed reward. By contrast, both OB rat groups continued to choose the larger but delayed reward throughout phase 2 in the majority of trials. The typical behavioural hyperactivity of OB rats in the 'open field' apparatus was attenuated by chronic administration of DMI. The results suggest that the OB rat has a deficit in food-motivated behaviour and appears to have reduced adaptation of this learned response when the conditions of the test are altered. Chronic desipramine treatment did not attenuate this effect.

Key Words: olfactory bulbectomy • 'waiting capacity' • 'open field' • desipramine • animal models

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 153-156 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026988119601000211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement