This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Willner, P. Articles by Muscat, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Willner, P. Articles by Muscat, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of amphetamine and pimozide on reinforcement and motor parameters in variable-interval performance

Psychology Department, City of London Polytechnic, Old Castle Street, London E1 7NT, UK

Anthony Towell

Psychology Department, City of London Polytechnic, Old Castle Street, London E1 7NT, UK

Richard Muscat

Psychology Department, City of London Polytechnic, Old Castle Street, London E1 7NT, UK

The effects of amphetamine and pimozide were studied in rats performing on variable-interval (VI) schedules of reinforcement. In experiment 1, a five-component multiple VI schedule was used; in experiments 2 and 3, two VI schedules were presented on alternate days; a fourth experiment was carried out to validate the two VI methods. The Herrnstein matching law was used to distinguish between changes in reinforcer efficacy and changes in motor capacity. In both procedures, amphetamine, at 0.5 mg/kg, caused changes compatible with an increase in reinforcer efficacy with no change in motor capacity; higher doses (only tested in the multiple schedule) appeared further to increase reinforcer efficacy and also to decrease motor capacity. In the multiple schedule, pimozide caused changes compatible with either a decrease in reinforcer efficacy or a decrease in motor capacity, depending on the order of presentation of the schedule components; in the alternating schedule, pimozide had both effects. These discrepancies appeared to be due to changes in the effect of pimozide over time, which could not be explained either by satiation or by a gradual onset of drug action.

Journal of Psychopharmacology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 140-153 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/026988118700100302


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?